• 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  •  首页
政策法规
  •  国内药监
  •  FDA
  •  EU
  •  PIC/S
  •  WHO
  •  ICH
  •  MHRA
  •  PMDA
  •  TGA
研发注册
  •  概览
  •  监管动态
  •  研究专题
生产质量
  •  概览
  •  监管动态
  •  各国GMP
  •  中国GMP
  •  中国GMP指南
  •  GMP对比
  •  检查缺陷
  •  研究专题
主题词库
  •  主题词库
帮助中心
  •  帮助中心
关于识林
  •  识林介绍
  •  识林FAQs
  •  功能介绍
  •  团队诊断
  •  联系我们
登录
  •  登录
  •  注册
替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

识林

药业组织联名发函希望改变FDA标签拟议规定

首页 > 资讯 > 药业组织联名发函希望改变FDA标签拟议规定

页面比对

出自识林

药业组织联名发函希望改变FDA标签拟议规定
标签
页面比对
笔记

2014-03-14 Lachman CONSULTANTS

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

药业组织联名发函希望改变FDA标签拟议规定
2014年3月7日 Bob Pollock

美国仿制药生产商协会(GPhA)宣称21家药业组织签署了一封联名信递交给FDA局长Margaret Hamburg,请求重新考虑标签变更拟议规定目前的版本。这些组织代表药师、支付方、药品福利管理者、批发商及其他业内人士,他们真正懂得允许仿制药生产商单方面变更标签究竟意味着什么。他们明白这一规定将给医疗保健系统带来的意想不到的后果。读完这封信后,您认为谁了解得更多?联名信见下:

Margaret A. Hamburg, MD
Commissioner of Food and Drugs
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993

March 6, 2014

Dear Dr. Hamburg,
Generic medicines are the backbone of America's pharmaceutical market, bringing trillions of dollars in savings for patients and the U.S. health care system, and fueling competition and innovation. Patient, physician, pharmacist and payor access to generic medicines rests on the foundation of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval of generic medicines as scientifically equal to the brand medicine in drug safety, efficacy and quality. However, the FDA's Proposed Rule on generic labeling could result in multiple versions of labels for the same medicines, which in turn may create uncertainty throughout the drug supply chain.
We fully support a streamlined, efficient process for updating safety information regarding the use of pharmaceutical products for health care practitioners and the general public. However, the Proposed Rule includes revisions to regulations governing generic drugs with respect to both when and how a labeling change would be required that could have unintended negative consequences. For example, the proposed rule creates the regulatory framework whereby multiple, different labeling, including different warnings, can simultaneously exist in the marketplace for multiple generic versions of a drug. This would be inconsistent with FDA's longstanding, unwavering emphasis on consistency in drug labeling and potentially confusing for health care professionals.
As drafted, this Rule also would burden consumers, taxpayers, large and small businesses, and state and federal governments with billions of dollars in increased costs for Generic medicines.
A new report by Matrix Global Advisors highlights the significant economic repercussions of this Proposed Rule:

  • The Proposed Rule could be expected to increase spending on generic drugs by $4 billion per year (or 5.4 percent of generic retail prescription drug spending in 2012).
  • Of this, government health programs could pay an additional $1.5 billion, and private health insurance, $2.5 billion for generic drugs.

The Proposed Rule also may expose pharmacists, physicians, generic drug manufacturers and others in the health care system to substantial new tort liability costs; these, in turn, would require generic manufacturers to adjust prices to stay in business, withdraw products, or decline to launch new affordable versions of brand medicines. This would have a chilling effect on the ability of generic manufacturers and others in the pharmaceutical supply chain to provide affordable medicines to millions of Americans and people across the globe. This is the opposite effect that was intended with the advent of Generic medicines.
As principals in the health care system, manufacturers must make certain that life-saving medicines include accurate, up-to-date labels for providers, prescribers, caregivers and patients. As a matter of public policy, any proposal to significantly change prescription drug labeling impacts an array of health care stakeholders beyond manufacturers – including patients, pharmacists, providers, distributors, group purchasing organizations, and employers.
The FDA and others need to fully explore the potential unintended consequences that the Rule may have on patient access and national health care costs. Permitting labeling changes for generic drugs without FDA approval counters 30 years of law requiring generic and brand medicines to have the same labels.
We believe that simple changes to the Proposed Rule can achieve all of FDA's objectives related to efficient communication of important safety information. At this critical juncture, we look forward to working with you and all stakeholders to identify a course of action that does not put patient safety or patient savings at risk.

Sincerely,
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP)
American Pharmacists Association (APhA)
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)
Amerinet
AmerisourceBergen
Cardinal Health
Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF)
CVS Caremark
Express Scripts
H. D. Smith
Healthcare Distribution Management Association (HDMA)
Healthcare Supply Chain Association (HSCA)
McKesson Corp.
MedAssets
National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS)
National Coalition on Health Care (NCHC)
Novation
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA)
Premier Healthcare Alliance
Walgreens

适用岗位:

  • QA(质量保证)
  • 注册
  • 市场
  • 研发

工作建议:

  • QA:监控标签变更的合规性,确保所有标签变更都符合FDA的最新规定。
  • 注册:负责提交CBE-0补充申请,确保及时更新药品和生物制品的标签信息。
  • 市场:在推广材料中使用更新后的标签信息,避免因标签信息不一致而导致的误导。
  • 研发:在研发过程中收集的数据,若影响产品标签,需及时通知注册部门进行变更。

适用范围:
本文适用于已批准的化学药和生物制品的标签变更,包括创新药、仿制药、生物类似药和原料药,由美国FDA发布,适用于Biotech、大型药企、跨国药企以及CRO和CDMO等各类企业。

要点总结:

  1. 标签变更补充申请(CBE-0):FDA提议允许ANDA持有者提交CBE-0补充申请,以临时更改产品标签,反映新获得的信息,与RLD标签不同。
  2. 信息公开:FDA将建立一个专门的网页,公开CBE-0标签补充申请中的标签变更信息,以便医疗保健提供者和公众在FDA审查期间获取。
  3. 一致性要求:所有ANDA持有者在FDA批准RLD标签变更后,必须在30天内提交CBE-0补充申请,以符合标签变更。
  4. 标签变更的批准:对于RLD标签的安全性变更,一旦获得批准,相应的ANDA补充申请也将获得批准。
  5. ANDA标签差异的例外:FDA提议增加一个例外,允许因CBE-0补充申请而导致的ANDA标签与RLD标签的临时差异。

以上仅为部分要点,请阅读原文,深入理解监管要求。

取自“https://lib.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=%E8%8D%AF%E4%B8%9A%E7%BB%84%E7%BB%87%E8%81%94%E5%90%8D%E5%8F%91%E5%87%BD%E5%B8%8C%E6%9C%9B%E6%94%B9%E5%8F%98FDA%E6%A0%87%E7%AD%BE%E6%8B%9F%E8%AE%AE%E8%A7%84%E5%AE%9A”
上一页: 【梳理】各利益攸关方对FDA标签拟议规定各持己见
下一页: 多家企业扎堆召回,关注药品生产质量
相关内容
相关新闻
  • GPhA要求延长标签规定拟议的评...
  • 【梳理】各利益攸关方对FDA标...
  • 两大团体对FDA标签拟议的替代...
  • 两议员就仿制药标签变更规定拷...
  • GPhA激烈批评FDA的仿制药标签...
热点新闻
  • 学习 “药典文献汇编” 迎接...
  • ICH 发布新 Q1 稳定性指南...
  • 【直播】25年4月全球法规月报...
  • 国内无菌附录征求意见稿发布,...
  • 国内药政每周导读:工艺验证检...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP