• 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  •  首页
政策法规
  •  国内药监
  •  FDA
  •  EU
  •  PIC/S
  •  WHO
  •  ICH
  •  MHRA
  •  PMDA
  •  TGA
研发注册
  •  概览
  •  监管动态
  •  研究专题
生产质量
  •  概览
  •  监管动态
  •  各国GMP
  •  中国GMP
  •  中国GMP指南
  •  GMP对比
  •  检查缺陷
  •  研究专题
主题词库
  •  主题词库
帮助中心
  •  帮助中心
关于识林
  •  识林介绍
  •  识林FAQs
  •  功能介绍
  •  团队诊断
  •  联系我们
登录
  •  登录
  •  注册
替换
查找内容:
替换为:
全部替换
插入链接
链接网址:
链接显示标题:
请选择网址类型
点我插入链接
插入文件
文件名称:
文件显示标题:
请选择文件类型
点我插入文件
发现错误 发表观点

原文内容

反馈意见

提交 正在提交..... 反馈历史

复制下面的地址分享给好友

确定 正在提交.....
train

你好,

关闭
提交 重做 重新开始 关闭
跳转
  • 新建同级
  • 新建子级
  • 删除
  • 重命名
选择收藏夹
新建收藏夹
公开

取消 确定

1. 基本信息
姓名:
企业:
职位:
联系方式:
邮箱:
2. 请在此填写您的问题,我们将优先安排答疑
提交

报名成功!
课程观看链接如下:
请添加课程助理微信,获得更多信息:
确认
确定
取消 确认

  • 知识
  • 视频
  • 社区
  • 政策法规
    • 国内药监
    • FDA
    • EU
    • PIC/S
    • WHO
    • ICH
    • MHRA
    • PMDA
    • TGA
  • 研发注册
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 研究专题
  • 生产质量
    • 概览
    • 监管动态
    • 各国GMP
    • 中国GMP
    • 中国GMP指南
    • GMP对比
    • 检查缺陷
    • 研究专题
  • 主题词库
  • 帮助中心
  • 关于识林
    • 识林介绍
    • 识林FAQs
    • 功能介绍
    • 团队诊断
    • 联系我们
  • 30天免登录

    忘记密码?

识林

GPhA指出仿制药为美国公众节省更多费用

首页 > 资讯 > GPhA指出仿制药为美国公众节省更多费用

页面比对

出自识林

GPhA指出仿制药为美国公众节省更多费用
GPhA
页面比对
笔记

2014-09-11 Lachman CONSULTANTS

跳转到: 导航, 搜索

国会预算局(CBO)上月的报告显示在医疗卫生方面的花费骤降。所节省的费用中很大一部分得益于仿制药的使用。今年仿制药协会的年度费用节省报告显示,消费者(包括联邦政府)在2013年共节省了2390亿美元,比2012年的节省量增加了14%。

2004-2013年仿制药节省的费用 GPhA2004-2013年仿制药节省的费用.png
来源:IMS医疗卫生情报协会的报告

在过去10年间,因使用仿制药所节省的费用已到达15000亿美元。

“这份报告证实了仿制药所节省的费用在保持增长。在每年节省的总费用不断增长的同时,这份报告还显示仅2013年上市的新仿制药就为美国健康系统节省了1400亿美元。已上市的仿制药产品也在持续节省费用,在2013年它们节省了980亿美元。”(GPhA发布)

这份报告在Hatch-Waxman法案(药品价格竞争与专利期补偿法,1984)颁布30周年纪念之际发表。这是个好消息,并且说明该法案在节省国家医疗健康费用方面的重要性。这是成功的(如果不是最成功的)价格立法之一,自颁布之日起就不断减缓医疗健康费用增加的趋势。

仿制药企业和GPhA一直以来持续支持仿制药办公室的工作,在他们的努力之下,为市场带来更多价格实惠的仿制药。

Lachman CONSULTANTS - Bob Pollock先生 2014-09-10
校译:识林-椒 2014-09-11

GPhA Annual Cost Savings Report Shows Larger Savings for the US Public
Written by Bob Pollock • September 10, 2014

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report last month indicated that the cost of health care programs has slowed sharply. A large part of the savings is attributed to the cost savings realized through the use of generic drugs. This year's GPhA Cost Savings report showed that consumers (including the US Government) saved $239 million alone in 2013 an increase of 14% over the savings seen in 2012.

Generic Cost savings 2004-2013 GPhA2004-2013年仿制药节省的费用.png

Source: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics' report

The 10 year savings from generic availability is reported at $1.5 trillion over the last 10 year period.

“The report confirms that the story of generic savings remains one of growth. In addition to the yearly growth of the savings totals, the report reveals that new generic products coming to market in 2013 saved the U.S. health system $140 billion alone. Established generic products continue to provide cost savings and, in 2013, they accounted for $98 billion in savings.”(the GPhA release says)

This report comes days before the 30th anniversary of the Hatch-Waxman Act (Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984). The news is good and points out the importance of the legislation in terms of reducing associated health care costs in this country. This is one of (if not the most) successful piece of legislation with regards to reducing the trend of increases in health care costs that has ever been enacted.

The generic drug industry and GPhA continue to support the Office of Generic Drugs program in its efforts to bring more affordable generic drug products to market.

Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Hatch-Waxman Act)

Mandatory Reading:

  • Regulatory Affairs (Reg)
  • Intellectual Property (IP)
  • Quality Assurance (QA)
  • Legal Department

Work Suggestions:

  • Reg: Ensure the company's drug applications comply with the new drug application procedures and bioequivalence standards.
  • IP: Monitor patent term extensions and the impact on the company's patent strategy.
  • QA: Verify that manufacturing processes meet the identity, strength, quality, and purity requirements.
  • Legal Department: Advise on patent infringement issues and the legal implications of abbreviated new drug applications.

Scope of Application:
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 applies to chemical drugs, including new molecular entities and generic drugs, in the United States. It is intended for regulatory bodies, pharmaceutical companies, and legal entities involved in drug development and approval processes.

Key Points Summary:

  1. Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs): The Act allows for the streamlined approval of generic drugs by submitting abbreviated applications showing bioequivalence to the listed drug, without repeating costly and time-consuming clinical trials.

  2. Patent Term Restoration: Offers a mechanism to extend the effective patent life of a drug to partially compensate for the time lost during the regulatory review process, up to a maximum of five years.

  3. Data Exclusivity: Provides a period of data exclusivity, during which the FDA cannot approve ANDAs for other companies that rely on the innovator's safety and efficacy data.

  4. Patent Certification: Requires ANDA applicants to certify about the listed drug's patents or periods of exclusivity, which can trigger a patent infringement lawsuit.

  5. Regulatory Review Period: Defines the regulatory review period for calculating patent term extensions and sets rules for due diligence during the application process.

Conclusion:
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 is a landmark legislation that balances the need for accessible, affordable medications with the incentive for innovation. It has significantly impacted the pharmaceutical industry by fostering competition and ensuring that both innovator and generic drug companies have clear pathways to market. The above points are not exhaustive; for comprehensive understanding, the full text of the Act should be consulted.

取自“https://lib.shilinx.com/wiki/index.php?title=GPhA%E6%8C%87%E5%87%BA%E4%BB%BF%E5%88%B6%E8%8D%AF%E4%B8%BA%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%85%AC%E4%BC%97%E8%8A%82%E7%9C%81%E6%9B%B4%E5%A4%9A%E8%B4%B9%E7%94%A8”
上一页: 紫皮书,还不能与橙皮书相提并论
下一页: 新版USP_787和1787章颗粒物质指南评论
相关内容
相关新闻
  • FDA局长2013年GPhA年会发言
  • 仿制药注射剂pH值调节剂可不一...
  • 仿制药办公室正在出台更多指南
  • 仿制药商要求FDA修订ANDA增补...
  • 仿制药生产商与国际标准组织开...
热点新闻
  • ICH 新 CTD:时隔23年,全新...
  • 【直播】25年5月全球法规月报...
  • 【全文翻译】 FDA 局长文章...
  • APIC 发布原料药亚硝胺杂质风...
  • ECA 发布新版 GMP 审计指南...

 反馈意见

Copyright ©2011-2025 shilinx.com All Rights Reserved.
识林网站版权所有 京ICP备12018650号-2 (京)网药械信息备字(2022)第00078号
请登录APP查看
打开APP